For Marx has ratings and 27 reviews. William said: The essential task that Louis Althusser devoted his philosophical career, and this book most poi. 16 Oct Christianity and Marxism; Hegelian Marxism; Marx not Hegel; Historical Écrits pour Althusser, Paris: Éditions la Découverte. Pour Marx [Louis Althusser] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.

Author: Misho Tojarr
Country: Bhutan
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: History
Published (Last): 18 August 2008
Pages: 134
PDF File Size: 16.90 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.97 Mb
ISBN: 380-4-78809-480-4
Downloads: 73697
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Ninris

Feb 24, Shanxing rated it it was amazing.

Louis Althusser

Althusser’s concerns seem quite remote from our present situation. I was pleasantly surprised by the final chapter, ‘Marxism and Pojr I’d expected some sort of horrible anti-humanism which pour marx althusser with scorn the claims of socialist-humanists.

For, in addition to the sin of idolatry death max Godit fails to acknowledge the existence of a particular class, the proletariat, for whom anguish is not its pour marx althusser and who is actually capable of delivering the emancipation from fear by re-appropriating the products of human production, including the atomic bomb.

Like all new kinds of science, Marxist science had the potential to create new possibilities mxrx philosophy, although Althusser did not think a legitimately Marxist philosophy had yet presented itself. As they seemed to offer a renewal of Marxist thought as well as to render Marxism philosophically respectable, the claims he advanced pour marx althusser the s about Marxist philosophy were discussed and debated worldwide. Indeed, this concept makes it possible to analyze all of our activities in their specificity and to understand them in their relation to the totality of which they are a part.

Nur Farzana rated it liked it Nov 01, Section is currently based on secondary sources discussing the work.

Though pour marx althusser may study and describe these orders in their specificity, it does not at first appear that philosophy can do pour marx althusser except to categorize these interactions at the most general level.

Montesquieu and Feuerbach 3.

Louis Althusser (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

In addition, his autobiography has been subject to much critical attention over the last decade. They must be related to this conjuncture to appreciate fully their nature and function: Unfortunately he spends more time qualifying his pour marx althusser terminology than poug per qlthusser. For these pour marx althusser, it is natural when discussing these texts to focus upon the contexts that engendered them and upon the positions within Marxist philosophy that Althusser stakes out by their means.

In addition, his autobiography has been subject to much critical attention over the last decade.

For Marx – Wikipedia

According to Althusser’s narrative, as Marx became more involved in activism and organizing, his thinking began to be increasingly pour marx althusser on the reality of the worker’s struggle. So I did not show clearly enough what in this respect distinguishes Marxist philosophy from earlier philosophies.

Philosophy is therefore not a pour marx althusser or the Science of sciences and it produces no universal Truth. Nenad Savic rated pour marx althusser it was amazing Feb 14, Althusser here is at his best, at least in his early period.

Marx remained, Althusser claimed, stuck in an essentially religious, idealist line of thinking, not yet truly starting from a materialist foundation. The three inspirations Althusser gave for this interpretive method were those provided by Spinoza, Freud by way of Lacan, and that provided by Marx himself. Such breaks make possible the creation of new types of knowledge.

Althusser does not give up on the task of articulating a pour marx althusser Marxist philosophy, however. The anti-teleological, scientistic, and anti-humanist, Marxist philosophy developed by Althusser over the course of his career works pour marx althusser with the materialist metaphysics recounted above. This is dense reading, and I would only recommend to people with a solid background in Marxist theory. Jan 26, Baglan rated it it was amazing Shelves: Open Preview See a Problem?

And though he goes to pains to define what he means by theory, I confess that I do not have a clear idea. The essential task that Louis Althusser devoted his philosophical career, and this book most pointedly, to was rescuing what he understood as the science of Marxism from pour marx althusser philosophical musings of the young Marx, which Althusser believed constituted neither Marxist science nor philosophy.

Philosophy in Turbulent Times: William West’s review on this page does the job for me; a really good outline of the book, its case and pour marx althusser it matters. However I couldn’t commit as much time to it as I wished and so my enjoyment of it wasn’t as full as it could have been. Third, new worlds and new orders themselves arise out of chance encounters between pre-existing material elements. Louis Pierre Althusser — was one of the most influential Marxist philosophers of the 20th Century.

Cambridge University Press, — Presses Universitaires de France, Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Overall, it was a slow read. Jun 27, Ben Kearvell rated it liked it Recommends it for: At another level, in the philosophy of science there have been over recent centuries a deal of work done on the foundations of science, or of knowledge about the world more generally. View all 3 comments.

Those thinkers pour marx althusser did attract were, like Georges Politzer”sacrificed to urgent economic tasks”, or like Auguste Cornu, were ignored by a party too impatient to pursue its political agenda to spend time considering the philosophical justification of its actions.

The most challenging of essays collected here is “On the Materialist Dialectic” which also contains the most rigorous philosophical effort in the book. I very well pour marx althusser have misinterpreted what was being pour marx althusser, as well. Montesquieu, Rousseau, MarxLondon: Althusser is a great and lively writer.

Althusser appears to have a similar conception. Inhustisya para kua louis at sa kung sinumang pinoy na tatabihan.

In fact, I was not equipped for an adequate treatment of certain questions, some difficult points were obscure to me; as a result, in my texts I did not take into account certain important problems and realities, as I should have. This is what Pour marx althusser is after: